Re: 1991 Nagoya banzuke

[Masumi Abe <abe@accesscom.com>]

1991 Nagoya Banzuke

Ye Asahifuji 8-7
Yw Hokutoumi 9-6
HYe Ohnokuni 4-5 (retired)
Oe Konishiki 12-3
Ow Kirishima 10-5
Se Kotonishiki 4-11
Sw Takatoriki 9-6 (Kanto-sho)
Ke Akinoshima 8-7
Kw Takahanada 11-4 (Shukun-sho, Gino-sho)
M1e Akebono 8-7
M1w Kotogaume 6-9
M2e Daishoyama 5-10
M2w Wakahanada 7-8
M3e Tochinowaka 8-7
M3w Terao 6-9
M7e Kyokudozan 8-7
M8w Sakahoko 10-5
M9e Mitoizumi 10-5
M13 Kotofuji 14-1 (Yusho, Kanto-sho, lost to Takahanada, beat Konishiki,
Kirishima, Akebono, Sakahoko, Mitoizumi)

So, it seems like John's banzuke is one rank (or I should say a half
rank) shifted from the real one.

-Toshiyori Masumiriki

John Farrell wrote:

> Sumoans, I am confused about the 1991 Nagoya banzuke.  Here are
> the top bits of 1991 Natsu and Nagoya as I have them.
>
> Natsu
> Hokutoumi       Yokuzuna-E      0-0-15
> Onokuni Yokozuna-W      0-0-15
> Asahifuji       Haridashi-Yokozuna-E    14-1
> Chiyonofuji     Haridashi-Yokozuna-W    1-3-R
> Konishiki       Ozeki-E 14-1
> Kirishima       Ozeki-W 11-4
> Kotonishiki     Sekiwake-E      8-7
> Akebono Sekiwake-W      7-8
> Terao   Komusubi-E      5-10
> Takatoriki      Komusubi-W      9-6
> Akinoshima      Maegashira-1E   9-6
> Takahanada      Maegashira-1W   9-6
> Tochinowaka     Maegashira-2E   7-8
> Misugisato      Maegashira-2W   6-9
> Kotogaume       Maegashira-3E   8-7
>
> Nagoya
> Asahifuji       Yokuzuna-E      8-7
> Hokutoumi       Yokozuna-W      9-6
> Onokuni Haridashi-Yokozuna-E    4-5-R
> Konishiki       Ozeki-E 12-3
> Kirishima       Ozeki-W 10-5
> Kotonishiki     Haridashi-Ozeki-E       4-11
> Takatoriki      Sekiwake-E      9-6
> Akinoshima      Sekiwake-W      8-7
> Takahanada      Komusubi-E      11-4
> Akebono Komusubi-W      8-7
> Kotogaume       Maegashira-1E   6-9
> Daishoyama      Maegashira-1W   5-10
> Wakahanada      Maegashira-2E   7-8
> Tochinowaka     Maegashira-2W   8-7
> Terao   Maegashira-3E   6-9
>
> As noted in previous mail, Kotonishiki was never ozeki. Masumi Abe
> says he was actually higashi sekiwake (is that east or west?). Anyway,
> that means either Takatoriki or Akinoshima has the wrong rank in the
> Nagoya banzuke as well. However looking at the records and the
> promotions, the wrong banzuke looks quite OK; there are no obvious
> mistakes. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Oziyoziyozi
> --
>  /\\\  Mincom    | Dr John Farrell            | email:
> jfarrell@mincom.com
> // \\\   Pty Ltd | Mincom Technology Research |
> \\ /// Brisbane  | Middleware Architect       |
>  \///  AUSTRALIA | EASI Project               |


--
************************************************************
copyright (c) 1998 Masumi Abe
************************************************************
<abe@accesscom.com> Masumi Abe <abe@sentius.com>
San Francisco Bay Area / Silicon Valley / Palo Alto
My Own Web Site: http://www.accesscom.com/~abe/
JUSTIN URL: http://www.dosanko.co.jp/spoton/abe/index.html