1991 Nagoya banzuke

[John Farrell <jfarrell@mincom.com>]

Sumoans, I am confused about the 1991 Nagoya banzuke.  Here are
the top bits of 1991 Natsu and Nagoya as I have them.

Natsu
Hokutoumi	Yokuzuna-E	0-0-15
Onokuni	Yokozuna-W	0-0-15
Asahifuji	Haridashi-Yokozuna-E	14-1
Chiyonofuji	Haridashi-Yokozuna-W	1-3-R
Konishiki	Ozeki-E	14-1
Kirishima	Ozeki-W	11-4
Kotonishiki	Sekiwake-E	8-7
Akebono	Sekiwake-W	7-8
Terao	Komusubi-E	5-10
Takatoriki	Komusubi-W	9-6
Akinoshima	Maegashira-1E	9-6
Takahanada	Maegashira-1W	9-6
Tochinowaka	Maegashira-2E	7-8
Misugisato	Maegashira-2W	6-9
Kotogaume	Maegashira-3E	8-7

Nagoya
Asahifuji	Yokuzuna-E	8-7
Hokutoumi	Yokozuna-W	9-6
Onokuni	Haridashi-Yokozuna-E	4-5-R
Konishiki	Ozeki-E	12-3
Kirishima	Ozeki-W	10-5
Kotonishiki	Haridashi-Ozeki-E	4-11
Takatoriki	Sekiwake-E	9-6
Akinoshima	Sekiwake-W	8-7
Takahanada	Komusubi-E	11-4
Akebono	Komusubi-W	8-7
Kotogaume	Maegashira-1E	6-9
Daishoyama	Maegashira-1W	5-10
Wakahanada	Maegashira-2E	7-8
Tochinowaka	Maegashira-2W	8-7
Terao	Maegashira-3E	6-9

As noted in previous mail, Kotonishiki was never ozeki. Masumi Abe
says he was actually higashi sekiwake (is that east or west?). Anyway,
that means either Takatoriki or Akinoshima has the wrong rank in the
Nagoya banzuke as well. However looking at the records and the
promotions, the wrong banzuke looks quite OK; there are no obvious
mistakes. Any ideas?

Thanks,

Oziyoziyozi
-- 
 /\\\  Mincom    | Dr John Farrell            | email:
jfarrell@mincom.com
// \\\   Pty Ltd | Mincom Technology Research |
\\ /// Brisbane  | Middleware Architect       |
 \///  AUSTRALIA | EASI Project               |