[sumo] oshi-dashi'd message

["Christopher J. Basten" <cbasten@statgen.ncsu.edu>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Kari Halonen" <kari.halonen@welho.com>
Subject: Fw: [sumo] [spoiler] matta?  no matta!
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:05:27 +0300

Hi there,

I wonder if c is the right one.

Tamarikido did not put his right hand near doyho so long I remember.  He kept it bent like in an invisible plaster.
Maybe it was aching or could not be straigtened at all, and had a special permission to touch dohyo only with the left one..

I wonder if Takanowaka learned the new rule from him in this this bout, altrough he hatakikomid it.
http://www.banzuke.com/~juryoika/200403/day2/20040302155%20Takanowaka-Tamarikido.asf

Happy tachi-ai to you too
Hakajusakari

----- Original Message -----
From: "J S" <jejima@hotmail.com>
To: <sumo@statgen.ncsu.edu>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 4:45 PM
Subject: [sumo] [spoiler] matta? no matta!


> So, have a look at the Takanowaka vs Kaiho match
> (http://www.banzuke.com/~movies/aki2004/day6/takawaka_kaiho.rm), and answer
> the quiz.....
>
> a) There was no matta (so no problem)
> b) The gyoji was unsighted (on his near-side ;-)
> c)  They've changed the tachiai rules
> d)  This was the biggest matta NOT to be called by either the gyoji or the
> shimpan since they got strict on the two hands down on the ground rule.....
>
> Jejima
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
> http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
>
> [EndPost by "J S" <jejima@hotmail.com>]



[EndPost by "Christopher J. Basten" <cbasten@statgen.ncsu.edu>]