Re: Yaocho - whose fault is it really?

[Moti-kun <sumo@dichne.com>]

Masumi Abe wrote:

> Seems like at least some of the members didn't read the post I wrote as "my
> previous post" which corrected my first post about this issue. This is the one
> I corrected my original post after Doreen posted that Itai did not mention
> anything about the list of 17 rikishi. This is not for telling the ML that my
> first post was right, but to proof that I followed with my correction. And this
> is the post I mentioned as "my previous post".
>
> -Toshiyori Masumiriki
>
> -----------------

A. All I said was that the naming of names was not DURING the press conference, and
I DID read the second post. What seemed to me is that other members had misread
those posts and believed the 17 rikishis were named at the press conference, which
simply isn't true.

<It's not an imagination of me or the weekly magazine. If it is an
imagination, that is of Mr. Itai himself.> (From Abe-san's post)


B. I never doubted anybody or anything, just thought it could be the figment of the
NEWSPAPER'S imagination, not Abe-san's.

C. This doesn't mean I believe or disbelieve Itai's allegations. It's just a
stating of facts.

D. I believe most of Itai's allegations pertaining to the present are a load of
steed-manure. But that's me, huh?

 E. C and D are completely contradictory. So sue me!!

Moti